AI, Art, and the Double Standard
- ianmccranor8
- May 4
- 2 min read
It’s interesting how quickly people dismiss AI in creative work.
You see the same comments over and over again:
“If you can’t do the artwork yourself…”
“If you can’t be bothered to hire an artist…”
“Then what’s the point?”
And I get it. On the surface, it looks like something is being “skipped.” Like a shortcut has been taken.
But here’s my honest response to that…
Well done — you use a calculator instead of doing maths in your head.
You use GPS on your phone instead of pulling out a paper map.
So what’s the difference?
Tools Don’t Replace Skill — They Amplify It
No one questions using a calculator.
No one criticises using GPS.
Why?
Because we understand those tools don’t replace intelligence — they enhance it.
They allow us to:
Move faster
Solve bigger problems
Focus on what actually matters
AI is no different.
It’s Not About the Tool — It’s About the Vision
In my case, I’m building an online comic project that evolves daily.
New panels drop every day
The story constantly twists and changes
Real people become characters
Even past panels can be reworked as the story develops
That level of speed, flexibility, and scale simply wouldn’t be possible using traditional methods alone.
AI hasn’t replaced creativity here — it’s made the project possible.
The Real Question
So maybe the question isn’t:
“Why use AI?”
Maybe it’s:
“What are you creating with it?”
Because at the end of the day, people don’t connect with tools.
They connect with stories.
Moving Forward
We’ve seen this before with every major shift in technology.
Digital art vs traditional art
Photography vs painting
CGI vs practical effects
There’s always resistance at first.
And then eventually… it becomes part of the process.
Final Thought
AI isn’t the enemy of creativity.
Used properly, it’s one of the most powerful creative tools we’ve ever had.
The real difference will always come down to the person using it.





Comments